Floggin' and Bloggin'

Struggle in Poetry: Personal Conflict in Theodore Roethke's "My Papa's Waltz"

2009-04-21T11:09:00.000-07:00

Poetry is a unique art. Nowhere else can twenty-six simple characters be organized into relatively few carefully-worded lines to create innumerable perspectives on the parts of life and the world that we hold most dear—all at the will of a single person. In poetry, hardships, struggles, passions, and desires come alive as they embrace loaded words and a special array of metaphors, rhyme, and figurative language that not only depict them but also serve to elicit a higher meaning not explicitly mentioned in the text. A fantastic example of the power and intensity of this extraordinary art form is Theodore Roethke’s “My Papa’s Waltz.” This short but impressive work utilizes the creative effects of diction, contradictory imagery, and extended metaphor to illustrate the troubled relationship between a young child and his father. Through their elicitation of emotions and their overall creation of a rather violent, but satiric tone, these devices ultimately work together throughout the sixteen short lines to create a central contrast and theme within the poem that keeps the reader thinking and questioning until the very end.

Roethke’s diction begins this slow and carefully-orchestrated effect by utilizing the connotations of various key words in order to form a variety of imagery and feelings that, as a whole, contribute to the overall tone of the poem. For example, throughout the poem we see the presence of words such as “romped”, “unfrown,” and “hung,” alluding to a sense of fun and playfulness. Right next to those words, however, we happen to find opposing, more negative words, such as “scrapes,” beating,” and “death,” whose connotations give the reader a sense of violence and cold fear and directly contrast with the feelings evoked by the happier words around them. Similarly, words such as “dizzy” and “missed” give way to feelings of confusion and disorientation, serving to add a third volatile emotion into the battle. As a result, the poem develops a particular tension that then allows Roethke’s other important devices to take shape and begin taking effect.

Among the most important of these devices is imagery. Due to the various emotions involved in the words and the tension existing between the respective groups, the text begins to develop vivid images that help to create a visual depiction of the relationship between the boy and his father. We are shown the boy “[hanging] on to [his father] like death.” We witness “[romping] until the pans slid off the kitchen shelf” and the father “beating time on [the boy’s] head.” We also hear about the boy’s “right ear [scraping] a buckle” whenever something went awry in their relationship. As a result of these images, we begin to notice that abuse is a problem and that violence is very much a part of their relationship.

Yet, while these examples seem to clearly demonstrate the situation between the two, we as readers are still thrown off by the use of the happier words by the speaker and are simply left with a tone of tension and confusion. With such contradictory feelings, we are left to question if this poem is supposed to have a positive or negative tone and if the speaker is comfortable or upset about his relationship with his father. In turn, we begin to perceive a certain struggle between happiness and fear of violence within the speaker’s tone and in the speaker himself and slowly begin to see the hardship that Roethke is trying to illustrate. Torn between every man’s natural tendencies to love his father and the instinctive ways in which we all avoid physical injury, Roethke’s speaker in the poem is consumed with a fight within himself of which there is no obvious solution and is thus placed in a vicious cycle that never really ends. As a result, the struggle forms the central theme of the poem and the primary character conflict whose mere nature causes us as readers to question ourselves and our motives during similar situations.

Furthermore, this central struggle is finally lodged into place by the extended metaphor of the waltz, which puts all of Roethke’s imagery into a context that keeps the poem organized and effective through a number of clever effects. For one, the idea of a waltz, or any dance for that matter, suggests a certain intimacy and partnership, two ideas that directly contrast with the violent imagery that the speaker utilizes. Consequently, this contradiction thus helps to further develop the tension and confusion experienced by the speaker and thus enhances the central theme of his struggle. Furthermore, the dance metaphor also implies the idea of rhythm, giving the reader a sense of repetition, which, in many ways, describes the pattern of the relationship between the speaker and his father as everlasting and cyclical. This makes sense when the first and last quatrains are brought into consideration. In both, there exists the imagery of holding on, using phrases like “but I hung on like death” and “still clinging to your shirt.” Furthermore, the image of going to bed in the last quatrain suggests that the end of the waltz, or struggle, is only temporary and that there is no guarantee the following day will present a solution to the speaker’s problem. In the end, the waltz provides a unifying factor throughout the poem that ultimately keeps Roethke’s message clear and unobstructed.

In conclusion, “My Papa’s Waltz” is a poem about hardship, pain, and making tough decisions. Describing a cyclical conflict of emotion within the speaker regarding his father, the poem demonstrates how hard life can be sometimes and how difficult those issues can be to handle. Yet, despite the accurate description of struggle, we, as readers, are ultimately left with no conclusion and knowledge of how the speaker resolves these problems. Does he finally work something out with his father? Does he choose to forgive him? Does he choose to love him? In the end, we don’t know, but that’s the point. Roethke’s message is simply that things don’t always get fully resolved and that sometimes it’s best merely to deal with one’s issues rather than try to resolve them. As a result, “My Papa’s Waltz” leaves us with the important lesson that not everything in life is easy or has an answer, but as long as we keep focused on our issues, the best possible outcome can always happen.

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest--Final Paper

2009-04-12T22:21:00.001-07:00

For my final project in English, I have decided to read and write about Ken Kesey's classic One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. A big fan of Jack Nicholson and having seen the movie before, I chose this novel because I found the movie an absolute delight and really wanted to know the real story behind it as most books are better than the movies that are based on it. So far, I am not dissapointed in the least and find both the characters and the themes presented in the novel captivating and provoking. The ways in which McMurphy uses his wit and quick mind to constantly bring change into the mental ward is, for me, one of the most interesting things in the novel and certainly what drives it forward. His interactions with the Chief, Harding, and the other patients help to create a sense of chaos and disruption to a place that is largely structured around rigid and disciplined schedules and complete order. As a result, McMurphy seems to flip the foundation of the ward inside out, making the patients contained within seem more like prisoners and helpless rational beings than Miss Ratched totalitarian nursing staff. This thus drives the book forward and provides a strong basis for what much of the dialogue and action within is created.

For the paper, I am not entirely sure what I am going to write on, but the initial impressions I have witnessed above is along the lines of what I think would interest me the most in the composition of my essay. The kind of rebelliousness that McMurphy embodies through his character development is definitely a central part to the book and a part that I feel will create a backbone for a lot of the themes that the story conveys. Therefore, I hope that my paper will at least touch on this, if not present it entirely as it is a part of life I think is fundamental to every person and their natural impulses.

I look forward to finishing the book in the coming week and then getting to writing about is as soon as possible.

Death of a Salesman and the Subject of Success

2009-03-08T23:05:00.000-07:00

During class discussion this week, we had a one quite-heated discussion that stuck out in my mind: success. Taking a cue from a question posed by Rob, my classmates and I took almost half our class time to discover a solid, concrete, and universal definition of success and in what ways that success could be measured, eventually channeling that into an agreeable answer as to why Willy was unsuccessful. Yet, much to our dismay, the class period ended before any reasonable solution could be agreed upon and the subject was left unresolved. Therefore, I would like to take this time here to contribute my two-cents upon the subject of success and its relation to "Death of a Salesman"

My answer is actually quite simple: success is ultimately based upon the interpretation of the individual in which that success is concerned. In other words, success can really only be determined on a case-to-case basis that almost entirely revolves around what drives that particular individual to become satisfied, meaning that one man's view of success is not necessarily the same view as another's. Just because a homeless man who spends his life on the street begging for money considers another man working at McDonald's successful does not necessarily mean that the McDonald's employee feels the same way and thus, this view of success is not universally accepted. Yes, it is probably safe to argue that the employee is more successful than the homeless man, but the homeless man's opinion of the employee does not directly tell us whether or not the employee is satisfied with his or her social condition and if he or she has reached the "favorable or desired outcome" in life (Webster.com). It is just as likely that the very employee the homeless man envies is completely unsatisfied with his or her job and is looking for something more out of life. As a result, it is quite likely the employee would consider himself or herself neither successful nor satisfied and would be continuously looking for new ways to obtain his or her goals in the future.Therefore, the only true way to find out if someone is successful or not is to gain insight into his or her own personal opinion on the matter.

In the case of Willy and Biff in The Death of a Salesman, the insight we gain into each of these characters through the dialogue that Miller presents gives us the ability to definitively judge whether or not these men are successful or not. For example, through the overall plot of the story and the vivid dialogue between Ben, Biff, Happy, Linda, and him at various part of the play, we as a reader can safely determine that Willy is unsuccessful. Consumed with suicidal thoughts, fed up with petty money matters, concerned about Biff's future, and trying to accept the fact he was fired from his firm after thirty-five years, Willy is clearly unsatisfied with his life and constantly regretting the decisions he made (such as not moving to Alaska with Ben). After trying everything he can to change his situation, from skewing the reality of his problems to helping Happy and Biff start up a new company, he meets failure and dismay, simply digging himself deeper and deeper into his eventual grave. In the end, he is pushed over the edge by an argument with his family that seems to have a happy ending, but only concludes when Willy crashes the car on-purpose and kills himself. Thus, due to unhappiness that leads to suicide and a complete unsatisfaction with his life, it is safe to assume that Willy would consider himself (and thus is) unsuccessful.

On a similar note, an adequate and informed evaluation of Biff's success can also be made through the book's plot and dialogue. Although a scholarly discussion could ensue about whether the he is successful or not, given the last scene where he finally admits his flaws and breaks free of his father's expectations, the play does give us plenty of info to make our respective case. For one, we know what Biff's perceptions are about the farm and how he doesn't really like any of the other jobs he has found. Furthermore, we also know much of the hardship he's been through, living half his life with the knowledge that his father cheated on his mother, an event that ultimately cost him his football scholarship at UVA and serves as the catalyst for much of Biff's social situation and disposition toward his family in the plot. As a result, Miller gives us the tools to judge him as a success or not, thus allowing us to make an informed and justified decision.

In the end, it thus seems that success is in the eye of the beholder and that finding it is a struggle different for each individual. The morals behind one's goals can be contested and the ways to pursue them can be suggested, but ultimately what defines success for that person can never be changed. Thus, Death of a Salesman teaches us the dangers of stubbornness on the road to success and what confusion and being overwhelmed can do to a man. From this, we learn that when finding success, achieving it is not whats important but rather the road one takes to get there because that will determine one's fate. (894, yeah, it's long)

The Overall Theme of Freedom in Henrik Ibsen's "The Doll House"

2009-02-23T04:10:00.000-08:00

Try to state the theme of the play. Does it involve women's rights? Self-fulfilment?

The story of "The Doll House" by Henrik Ibsen is a tumultuous and often confusing one about the life of a European housewife, Nora Helmer, and her struggles to escape both constant blackmailing by an old friend who she had taken out a forged loan with and her unsatisfactory life in the home; yet, underlying this intriguing and often-comical plot line is a myriad of valuable lessons and themes that help to give the play the high literary quality in which it is regarded. Ideas such as women's rights, self-fulfilment, and morality are all credible themes put forth by Ibsen's writing. Perhaps the most important and notable of these themes, however, is the theme of freedom and the belief that no one can truly be happy until he or she has full control of her life and nothing is standing in his or her way.

In Nora's case, this theme presents itself in many instances throughout the play. At the beginning of the novel, we see Nora joyful and happy, with seemingly lots to brag about, from a husband to supply her shopping habits to many children that she energetically plays with. Despite this, we can't help but get a sense of illusion in Nora's actions and are frequently caught off-guard by the extreme confidence, flamboyant behavior, and constant material focus. As a result, one does not feel that Nora is all that she seems and questions whether or not her un-realistic disposition is actually her true emotions.

Tainted with a bitter and unpleasant taste of the main character, the reader eventually makes his or her way to Act II and Act III, where he or she begins to realize their suspicions were right and that Krogstad, the antagonist, had once loaned Nora money to take her husband down to Italy. The trouble is that Nora forged her father's signature to approve the loan without the knowledge that forgery is a crime. Blackmailed by Krogstad to pay back the money and help him keep his job at the new bank that his now run by Mr. Helmer, Nora is sent into a fit of madness where she is desperately trying to negotiate with her husband and Krogstad, both of which are unrelenting in their agendas. As a result, she becomes controlled by both their wills and it is the decisions of the two men that determine the outcome to her problem. She can sway and negotiate with them all she wants, but ultimately the final decision is theirs.

Therefore, she is without freedom in much of the story's plot which makes her unhappy to the point of almost attempting suicide. Fortunately for her, as the end of Act III nears, the climax of the story occurs as Mr. Helmer finds out what Nora has done and becomes enraged and then experiences a huge shift in temperment upon receiving a letter from Krogstad stating that his previous letter informing him of Nora's mistake was premature and actually he had changed his mind about the matter. With Helmer much happier with his wife and the Krogstad situation solved, the ending would seem happy; however, it is here that Nora realizes that she has felt a lack of freedom in her life choices and decisions not only now, but throughout their entire marriage. She notices that she is merely a "doll" in their relationship and Helmer "plays with her" whenever we just wants to have some fun. She is not an equal nor a respected person, she feels, and because of that is unhappy. In her quest to find true happiness, she thus decides that leaving Helmer is the only way to be free and happy and conjures up the courage to tell him so, thus ending the story.

In the end, the play goes to show the relationship between freedom and happiness and that having the two is really the most important part of one's life. It teaches us no one will ever truly be happy and satisfied unless he or she is free, regardless of whether or not their personal affairs (i.e. the loan problem) is solved or not. As a result, we as humans should at all costs seek that happiness and free ourselves from the constraints that hold that happiness back. (726)

Polonius, the Father

2009-02-02T20:56:00.000-08:00

In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the character of this legendary play provide many influential insights into the motivations and character traits that shape who we are and how they affect us. Representing different real-life roles, each character takes on a personality that we can all relate to and then teaches us the importance, struggles, and disposition of that personality through the plot of the story. Thus, the character of Polonius in this story is no different and serves to represent to us the ideal, caring father who looks out for and takes care of his daughter. To illustrate this role, Polonius makes numerous actions throughout the play that serve to illustrate the two key roles that all fathers must play in their families in order to be considered ideal: protector and facilitator of success.

For starters, Polonius first illustrates the role of protector in the very first scene he appears, Act I, Scene III. Here, Polonius confronts Ophelia about what her brother Laertes and she had discussed regarding Prince Hamlet a moment before he entered and, after a few careful prompts, Ophelia finally admits that she is in love with the prince and vise versa. Yet, instead of congratulating his daughter on finding someone she loves or expressing an overarching tone of indifference, Polonius advises Ophelia of the dangers of such actions and tells her to remove herself from the boy to avoid getting her heart broken or herself taken advantage of. Even though Hamlet could bring the man lots of money and certainly raise his social stature, Polonius still pressures his daughter to go against her heart’s urges and to take everything Hamlet says with a grain of salt, reminding her to “believe so much in him that he is young,/And with a larger tether my he walk/Than may be given you.” As a result, he is protecting his daughter at all costs regardless of the benefits her actions could possibly bring him and this selflessness to protect his family is what helps him fulfill his role as a good-to-do, ideal father.

Furthermore, as the plot continues, he also merges into the other role of the facilitator of success in a very similar fashion. Once it becomes apparent to him upon Ophelia’s telling of her encounter with Hamlet in her private chamber in Act II, Scene I, Polonius becomes fully convinced that Hamlet is actually in love with is daughter and finally accepts their feelings for one another. Upon realizing what has been taking place between the two, he quickly decides it best to inform King Claudius immediately, thereby establishing the children’s relationship to the King. Among other motivations, it seems fitting considering Polonius’s character that this notification to the King is solely for the intention to arrange some sort of marriage between the two, one that would certainly bring great glory to his daughter (as well to him) and would promote her in the greatest of ways. In this way, he is ultimately working for her, trying to make her life as much of a success as possible and abandoning his other premonitions about Hamlet that he had prematurely judged beforehand.

In these ways, Polonius begins to develop himself as a role model for the ideal father he will play throughout the rest of the novel, adding more and more pieces on until he forms the ultimate character Shakespeare wants him to perform. (564)

Oedipus's Struggle: Human Nature's Resistance Against the Inevitable in Sophocles's "Oedipus the King"

2009-01-20T00:17:00.000-08:00

Sophocles's Oedipus the King, one of the Western Literature's most re-known tragic plays, the reader witnesses an ill-fated and doomed Oedipus, King of Thebes, slowly reach his fate as the one destined to kill his father, marry his mother, and start a family; yet, despite numerous warning signs from the beginning of the book, it is difficult to understand (and quite thought-provoking) as to why Oedipus, who is confronted with a mound of evidence prior to his realization and is so hellbent on finding the man who killed Laius and thus freeing his people from the deadly plague, waits so long to admit he is the one who must be ridden from the city. As one looks closer into this matter, it soon becomes quite plausible that in fact the one thing holding Oedipus back from his assertion of his fate is man's everlasting concept of hope.

Generally, when people are faced with situations that are quite disastrous to themselves, they usually hold out to hopefully hear a conclusion separate from the one they dread. Even if the evidence present points to that worst case scenario, the people involved never give up and always hold on to the hope of a miracle at the end. As a result, the truth is never fully admitted until the end is completely near and the horrible conclusion has been confirmed beyond a reasonable doubt. Innate within every individual that is born, this natural concept of hope is something that drives individuals to motivate themselves, push themselves, and stay alive, even when the odds are clearly against them and the ending is nothing other than inevitable to an outsider looking in.

Therefore, I believe the reason to which Oedipus was so stubborn in admitting to the fact he was the one who had killed is father and was, at that very time, filling out the prophecy was simply that common human notion of hope. Consumed with fear and dread, he never was able to step away from the situation and see what was going on from an unbiased, unaffected perspective, eventually ignoring the obvious evidence all around him simply because of his unstoppable hope. For example, when Teiresias first enters the story, he is regarded as a "student of mysteries, of all that that's taught and all that no man tells, secrets of Heaven and secrets of the earth" and as the only person that "can guard and save [the Thebians and their city]. (1293)" Yet, despite the honored introduction, within a few lines, Oedipus is disregarding Teiresias's information and accusing him of making it up because of a bribing scheme set up by Creon. Within only a few minutes it seems, Oedipus's opinion of Teiresias changes from one of respect and unworldly wisdom to one of hatred and disgust, simply because he does not tell what he wants to hear.

Furthermore, as this continues in similar fashion with people such as Jocasta and Creon, there is also ample evidence to suggest that, upon hearing about the Oracle's prophecy declaring that the killer of Laius should be expelled from the city, Oedipus knew it could be himself. In the beginning of the novel, as he explains to his people what he would be willing to give the person who came up and either admitted themselves as the murderer or pointed out who he was, he openly prays to the gods that "that man's life be consumed in evil and wretchedness," adding, "And as for me, this curse applies no less (1292)." Also, this occurs again as Oedipus reveals his story of leaving Corinth and coming to Thebes in hopes of outrunning the Delphi oracle's prophecy. He mentions the fact he killed a man at a place where three highways come together and that it could be Laius. As a result, he considers his involvement in the murder for the first time in the play, yet, still does not fully admit to doing it, even though there are too many coincidences to still render him innocent. Only until the messenger, the second messenger, and the shepherd arrive to tell him entirely of the prophecy he already knows does he finally decide that he must have been the one to commit the murder and that Jocasta has to be his mother. Thus, doomed to his fate and accepting his wretched existence, he runs off to the palace and later stabs his eyes out upon witnessing Jocasta's suicide.

As a result, it seems quite possible that Oedipus the King, among many other themes, also serves to give us an insight to the idea of hope and how that affects our acceptance of the inevitable. Whether dictated from a prophet or not, our fates are ultimately set in stone, but the hope that we can avoid the evil that might lie within it is a driving factor that shapes who we are as people and how we approach our problems. In the end, hope was what drove Oedipus to his gloomy blindness, so hellbent on his escape from what was his end that he had no other way to confront the pain when his fate came true and indirectly killed his mother, thus, serving as a lesson to all that hope is a double-edged sword that can shape the outcomes of our lives. (885)

Comments on Leo Tolstoy's "The Death of Ivan Ilyich"

2009-01-11T19:35:00.000-08:00

In Ronald Blythe's introduction to Leo Tolstoy's classic novella "The Death of Ivan Ilyich," Blythe notes that the book "evokes the sheer desolating aloneness of dying," referring to the fashion in which Ivan dies: with none of his loved ones by his side. At an first glance, this thematic observation may seem a relevant and noteworthy comment; however, if one steps back and re-examines the novella as a whole, it seems quite possible that maybe the story is much less about the isolation in death and much more about the importance having loved ones at one's side during that time of passing. Using Ivan's demise his method of delivery, Tolstoy sends a powerful and significant message, showing us that the more one is alone in his or her life, the more he or she will be alone in death.

Upon closer inspection to the downfall of Ivan, we witness many factors that lead to his being alone in death. Perhaps the most noticeable factor is his horrible relationship with his wife. Annoyed with her shallow disposition and constant nagging and realizing that he married the woman for all the wrong reasons, Ivan has much trouble getting along with his wife and consequently seeks refuge in his work. As a result, he becomes alienated from her throughout his life and, except for one brief period, they are not able to reconcile their differences.

As the plot carries on, we also learn that this detachment from Praskovya Fedorovna transcends his relationship with his daughter as well, who is, in many ways, much better connected to her mother than her father. This is probably mostly his fault, as is his marriage troubles are, but nevertheless, that absence of connection between his daughter and him further renders him alone and isolated at the time of his death.

Furthermore, Ivan's friendships, or lack thereof, are also another set of reasons why he finds himself without anyone at the time of his death. Due to his constant moves throughout Russia while taking new judicial positions, he never secures any deep friendships that last for long periods of time, despite his frequent use of work as an escape from his household troubles. In addition, he also constantly keeps his personal life separated from his official life, impeding his ability to form personal friendships in a professional setting. As a result, the relationships he does make with people happen to be shallow and without much meaning, leaving co-workers longing for his position rather than his survival when he falls ill.

In the end, all these factors lead to an alone and miserable Ivan, who remains confused as to why no one understands or cares for the fact he may die any day. In his confusion, he reacts only with anger, upset that no one has the common decency to at least try to show compassion for his condition; however, this anger simply pushes those around him further way, especially his wife and his daughter, to whom he constantly orders to go away and leave him alone in his last moments on earth. Only those who weren't so near to him before the illness, such as the young servant Gerasim, can become close to Ivan. Without any personal history to provide conflict, Ivan and Gerasim are able to develop a close relationship and Ivan is finally able to find someone who understands and cares for him in this time of need.

Therefore, in light of the incredibly sad and depressing death of Ivan, it seems quite apparent that Tolstoy's true intention was to demonstrate the importance of developing close ties with those one loves the most so that he or she does not meet a similar fate. And, thus, by learning from these mistakes, we can ensure ourselves a family-filled and intimate passing surrounded by those who truly care and love for us. (644)

Comparisons of Motive in both Joseph Conrad's "Heart of Darkness" and J.M. Coetzee's "Waiting for the Barbarians"

2008-12-07T23:38:00.000-08:00

John Conrad's Heart of Darkness and J.M. Coetzee's Waiting for the Barbarians are two quite similar books that portray a search for morals about colonization and that question the righteousness in the motives of huge imperial empires, from the Conrad's Imperial Africa to Coetzee's South-African police state, to colonize. Focusing on one character and his internal struggle between what his country thinks is right and what he thinks is right, the two novels ultimately arrive at the same conclusion: colonialism is a terrifying and horrific practice that blurs the line between the civilized and the uncivilized.

Both told from a first-person perspective, the novels ultimately reach this common theme through the way in which they present it. For starters, both novels begin at a restful state, one where the conflict of morals and the physical conflict that initiates it has not yet begun. In Heart of Darkness, this peaceful situation happens when Marlow is simply applying for the job, completing a typical transition from one job and a period of unemployment to the next. Similarly, in Waiting for the Barbarians, the magistrates post is relatively peaceful and, while he is a bit upset and curious about why Colonel Joll has locked up the man and the boy, who appear completely innocent, he himself is completely fine and any doubts about morality are simply pushed aside and the book moves forward.

Then, as the plots move along, a slow, but steady questioning of morality begins to enter the minds of the protagonist. In the magistrate's situation, it is the arrival and his subsequent affair with the barbarian girl that causes him to seriously question the morality of the Empire's actions. He realizes that he more or less has strong feelings for the girl, despite the fact she is of the "inferior race" or a "barbarian," and, as a result, begins to wonder why they are trying to launch a land-confiscating war against a people that can love and be loved just as much as any one of the Empire's citizens. With Marlow's case, this same situation arises as he notices the attitude taken toward the natives in the Congo and, because of his complete naivety to any and all culture of Africa, is quite shocked by the opinions he hears of people who are just as human as he is. For both these people, these situations eventually lead into that greater questioning, in which what each character's employer is doing seems quite wrong. For Marlow, this thinking predisposes him to a view that in arguably takes favor to the natives and sets himself up for the greater, physical challenge ahead. For the magistrate, sleeping with the girl and asking himself why he is so enthralled with her opens up the door to new inquiries, such as what happened in Joll's torture rooms and why the Empire is taking prisoners and torturing and killing them when, in his mind, there is clearly no offense being launched upon the frontier. These events ultimately set the stage for the climatic events that follow.

Finally, sooner or later, each story reaches that breaking point, where the main character is finally challenged in regard to what he believes and put through a test of both endurance and horror in order to see whether or not those beliefs will hold. This point is obvious in Waiting for the Barbarians, as the breaking point is undoubtedly the arrest of the magistrate upon his return from the moral act of returning the barbarian girl. Through torture and captivity, this period of the book is where his beliefs are challenged to the point of abandonment as he asks himself why does he care about the barbarians so much, was does he care about what is right, and why he is opposed to the colonization that the Empire has gone forth with. Luckily for the magistrate, his beliefs stay with him, regardless of the ends they are pushed to and as the story wraps up, they are able to resurface in a better light.

On the other hand, in Heart of Darkness, Conrad pushes Marlow to this point when he finally arrives at the station with Kurtz and Marlow decides that Kurtz's opinions toward the natives are more honorable and righteous than that of the Russian and the manager. As a result, he becomes almost vilified by the two white men, who regard Kurtz as a lost cause who has sadly been consumed by the savage way of thinking. This leads to further difficulties once Kurtz dies as Marlow is now faced with the prospect of figuring out the meaning of Kurtz's last words, while, at the same time, dealing with the death of the only person who had the same perspective on Africa as he did. Thankfully for Marlow, however, he soon becomes ill and it is not long until he is evacuated from the jungle and makes his return to the mainland of Europe.

In the end, both characters ultimately cleanse themselves of their moral dilemmas, with Marlow returning to Europe and the magistrate finally leading an autonomous town that lives at peace and without the moral ignorance of the Empire overhanging its streets, and thus the stories conclude.

From these outlines, it is quite apparent that the two stories are more or less the exact same and thus, their lesson that challenging authority and doing whats right ultimately works out in the end and so should be pursued no matter what is equally supported by both works. While both books may have a few different perspectives, this lesson is still prevalent in equal and whether a reader reads one or another is irrelevant: the message is still the same. Furthermore, the "hero's journey" that both characters go through also add to the theme by giving a process to moral questioning in order to give readers the ability to recognize it both in themselves and also in their own leaders. From this process, people can hopefully better identify the good and the evil in similar situations in the future, whether simply in one's own life or in the government of one's resident country. Therefore, because of these valuable lessons, Waiting for the Barbarians and Heart of Darkness are both amazing works and will continue to probe the topic of morality and empire for centuries.

Initial Impressions on J.M. Coetzee's "Waiting for the Barbarians"

2008-11-24T00:23:00.000-08:00

After reading Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness for a few weeks, one would generally not be extremely excited to explore yet another short colonization novel that takes place around the turn of the century; however, after only reading three chapters, I can honestly say I am surprised to find I thoroughly enjoy J.M. Coetzee's Waiting for the Barbarians. Given the long, tedious, and often tangential narration of Conrad's novel and considering the fact the curriculum intends for us to compare the two books, I found myself not at all apprehensive about reading Coetzee's story and constantly procrastinating on the completion of the assignment. Yet, as I began reading, I honestly could not put it down. One of the first things that jumped out at me is simply the style in which Coetzee writes. Using prose, colloquial language and a vivid present tense, the style of the book's narration creates a very captivating discussion effect, as if the Magistrate is actually with you face-to-face, telling you his story. For example, in the very first paragraph of the novel, the book opens with "I have never seen anything like it: two little discs of glass suspended in front of his eyes in loops of wire. Is he blind? I could understand it if he wanted to hide blind eyes. But he is not blind," and thus creating a clear thought dialogue that the reader instantly attaches him or herself to. In fact, this style is relatively similar to that of Marlow's narration in Conrad's book, but without the tedious and somewhat overzealous descriptions.

Furthermore, I was also drawn into the book by the magistrate's character, a quite right-minded man who to seems very sexually-focused as well. The first time we see him, we immediately notice his rather unorthodox position toward Colonel Joll's treatment of the natives. Given the fact the novel takes place around the turn of the century and that we get the impression the magistrate is white, the view he takes is extremely admirable and righteous. When Joll moves to capture as many natives as possible and torture them for answers into the whereabouts of the barbarian forces and the plans to their rumored revolution, the magistrate expresses opposition and feeds, provides doctors, and otherwise supports their well-being and ultimate return to their native lands. Yet, for reasons probably deliberately withheld from the reader, he cannot fully exercise enough power to shoot down the colonel's orders and, at least while he is there, prisoners are still taken and horrendous torture is carried out in their interrogations.

On the other hand, the magistrate also becomes an interesting character because of his intense sexual desires and his apparent love for the ex-prisoner that is now his servant. The fact that he is such an old man but is still sexually driven, sleeping with twenty-year-old girls and the native one, essentially shocks the reader, bringing him or her closer into the book with the hope of discovering more shocking details. As his makeshift love story ensues, the odd nature of it keeps us enthralled and the relative ups and downs of the relationship, from their physical break to his actually sleeping with her, helps the book to move forward fast.

In regards to the story itself, it was simply the weirdness of it that kept me reading. Its essentially a story of an old, white, and politically-powerful governor in his colonial land falling in love with a blind, tortured, and ex-captive native girl who only became the magistrate's servant because he could not have beggars on the streets. This oddly captivating story thus makes you want to continue reading in hopes of discovering anything else that adds to the unusual plot. Thus, between the ease of reading, the interesting protagonist, and the shocking plot, Waiting for the Barbarians is one book I'm very interested to continue reading to see where it leads.

Notes Regarding "The Congo Diary" by Joseph Conrad (My Actual Assigned One)

2008-11-18T08:33:00.000-08:00

--Attempts to portray a visual description of the Congo and the African landscape (p. 254)
--Tries to document everyday life in the Congo (how miserable it is, the people, the way the villages and European stations are set up, the living conditions, etc.)
--Various descriptions show the horrors of the colonization of Africa (about the dead bodies and skeletons, etc.)
--Racist tones (p. 255)
--p.260--tells of the African chief who brought a youth with a gunshot wound to the head into the station to receive medical care. Interesting.
--The descriptions of the first few days of the river journey sound like instructions meant for the use of later explorers; almost like a map of words.

Main Points Regarding the "Seclected Letters En Route to the Congo"

2008-11-16T20:04:00.000-08:00

Given reinforcing insight into the parallel connections between Conrad and his character Marlow
Outlines Conrad's extensive journey prior to his departure for the Congo and who he visited with
Reflections upon how Conrad felt prior to his departure (ie. his temperment and view on the risks involved with the journey and the job)
Close connection with family
Marguerite Poradowska--model for Marlow's aunt in the story
Expresses those feelings of loyalty and love toward her in the second-to-last letter; she is too him a positive distraction from the problems within his life.

Closure in the Last Section of The Sound and The Fury

2008-11-04T16:02:00.000-08:00

In William Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury, the fourth and last section of the novel delivers an interesting, but atypical conclusion to an already abnormal novel. Upon reading the last section, one might feel as if the novel ends incomplete and without resolution of the Compson family tragedy. Benjy is still treated more like a dog than as a human; Jason still runs the household with an iron fist; Mother remains the selfish, "o-so-pitiful" matriarch; and now both Caddy and Quentin are absent from the novel, after having escaped into the world outside Jefferson. Yet, while in the average story, this conclusion may be regarded as inconclusive, it is, in fact, the exact conclusion that Faulkner wants. According to Lawrence Edward Bowling, a professor at Kenyon College, "The Sound and the Fury is a novel about disorder, disintegration, and the absence of perspective" that is centered around "the internal chaos of the characters,--their intellectual, moral, and spiritual confusion" (Bowling 15). Thus, it is Faulkner's main intention to leave the reader with such a conclusion in order to reflect the chaos and disorder plaguing the family and that he views as his main theme. By leaving all the remaining characters in their current predicaments--Benjy screaming, Luster out of it, mother absent from the rest, and Jason as angry as ever--he effectively demonstrates that this order cannot be resolved and that three decades has done no good to help this chaotic family. Ultimately, on a larger scale, this ending, as well as the book as a whole, shows a tragic transformation of family from the nineteenth to the twentieth century and thus provides modernist critique of twentieth century life.

Examining Faulkner's Use of Time in The Sound and the Fury

2008-10-27T06:33:00.000-07:00

This week, I read Lawrence Edward Bowling's 1947 piece entitled "Faulkner: Technique of The Sound and the Fury," which examines the controversial chronological style that makes the novel so famous. In his piece, Bowling attempts to support Faulkner and his style, using a long and thorough argument to dispel accusations that the narrative technique is simply an "unnecessary obstacle" and providing relevant examples to show his reader how crucial the book's chronology is to the theme and the reader.

Essentially, however, Bowling sums his argument up in three main parts. First, he notes that, although utterly confusing, the disorder of time in the novel is necessary for the plot to make sense as a whole. Given the way that it was written, each of the book's four sections ultimately rely on the other three to be understood and if rearranged into chronological order by the dates at the beginning of each section, the novel could not make sense. This is because, peppered throughout the book, there constantly appear small facts and details that help us comprehend the story, yet, those facts are not always presented prior to a particular sections and sometimes are only revealed after the scene has taken place. Secondly, Bowling also argues that the random, stream-of-consciousness narration prevalent is crucial in helping each character develop a certain identity. In this book, we learn of the characters not by facts "but by [being presented] the reactions of certain characters to these facts" (Bowling 11). Therefore, the baffling and un-descriptive narration of Benjy and the soliloquy-esque, complex narration of Quentin are the only ways we as readers get to know the characters and understand how they work and think. Thus, Bowling points out that if all the narration in the book were like Benjy's or like Quentin's, there would be nothing unique and special about those characters and the reader would be left with a lesser understanding of what kind of people they truly are.

Finally, Bowling concludes his article with the point that Faulkner's narrative style is essential to the theme of the book. As he describes it, "The Sound and the Fury is a novel about disorder, disintegration, and the absence of perspective" centered around "the internal chaos of the characters,--their intellectual, moral, and spiritual confusion" (Bowling 15). Given the fact that much of the narration seems, at least to the reader, as chaotic and very confusing, Faulkner's style in this novel perfectly facilitates the novel's main theme and ultimately, we get a full understanding of the disorder in the characters' lives through it. Therefore, as Bowling puts it, "As an introduction to this theme, what could be more appropriate than the flat, perspective-less language of Benjy's section?" (Bowling 15). Thus, in the end, while the language is quite possibly the source of the reader's confusion, it is also the key to his or her complete understanding on the novel; a cruel double-edged sword.

All in all, I thought Bowling's piece on The Sound and the Fury was extremely enlightening and that it adequately explained why an author like Faulkner would use a technique so troublesome for his or her reader. It makes sense now why the story is written in such a fashion and with the information I have learned, such as Faulkner's attempt to use narration to portray disorder, disintegration, and absence of perspective, I can now apply that knowledge to better interpret the novel as I'm reading. Also, I found the article to be an interesting review of stream-of-consciousness as well, helping me to better understand much of what it is about. For example, Bowling, at one point, mentions how, in Quentin's section, Faulkner simplifies the thought processes to make it easier to understand. Given my personal perspective that section two was extremely complicated to begin with, I found it odd that Bowling would say this, but upon further reading, came to understand that if I myself were to write out my conscious thought process, it would also be quite confusing. Thus, it gave more meaning to my understanding of stream-of-consciousness and more credibility to Faulkner's narrative form.

In conclusion, I thought this work was a very thorough, informative, and ultimately enjoyable work on The Sound and the Fury

Article:

Faulkner: Technique of The Sound and the Fury
Lawrence Edward Bowling
The Kenyon Review, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Autumn 1948), pp. 552-566.
Published by: Kenyon College

Wartime Inhumanity: the Effects of War as Illustrated in Tim O'Brien's "The Things They Carried"

2008-10-03T02:26:00.001-07:00

In the short story “The Things They Carried,” Tim O’Brien illustrates a grotesque, graphic, but soberingly realistic depiction of war through the demise of the story’s main character, Lieutenant Jimmy Cross, in the setting of the 1960’s Vietnam conflict. Ripped apart by the death of one of the men under his command, in the story, Cross undergoes a transformation in which his idealistic, but obsessed attitude gives way to his formation into a mere machine fighting for the American war effort. Against a background of wartime brutality and horror, Cross’s transformation in many ways illustrates the demoralizing effect of war on the human soul through the eyes of O’Brien and ultimately presents the prevailing theme of the story: that war is a multifaceted destroyer that wreaks havoc on not only the body, but also the mind.

O’Brien conveys this theme through a couple of short steps. First, he begins by breaking the story into a number of short sections, each with its own subject, in order to contrast the horror, senselessness, and brutality of war against the nature of Cross’s character. To do this, the sections more or less switch off between characterizing Cross and his immense love obsession with Martha and creating an elaborate depiction of the war’s horrors. For example, the first paragraph of the story introduces the reader to Martha and Cross’s love for her, illustrating his predicament in that “more than anything, he wanted [her] to love him as he loved her” (1). From this, the reader gets the sense of a hopeless young man who “[is] just a kid at war, in love,” thereby characterizing the lieutenant as a caring, emotional being (22). Once at that understanding, the reader moves onto the next section and instead of finding an intricate description of emotion, discovers a laundry list of the heavy supplies and personal items each soldier carried. In contrast to the one before it, this section is part of O’Brien’s description of war’s brutality, depicting the physical strain each soldier much endure before even getting in a firefight. Later, these descriptions of war are further continued with the vast descriptions of weaponry, representing the ever-present reality of shooting and death in war. Thus, as a result, both of these sections contrast one another incredibly well by juxtaposing two different tones, war and love, thereby driving the conveyance of the theme forward.

With this structure in place, O’Brien then fully develops a contrast between Cross and the other characters, which in many ways represent the effect of war’s brutality, in order to better illustrate the transformation and the theme. Thus, because of the multiple sections describing his unwavering love for Martha, there develops a contrast between the caring and seemingly “humanity” of Cross and the relative indifference to life possessed by his men. As certain sections describe Cross’s good luck pebbles, letters from Martha, and his constant inquiry into her feelings toward him, others describe Norman Bowker’s (one of Cross’s men) good luck thumb, which is cut off the hand of a “VC corpse, a boy of fifteen or sixteen” before another of Cross’s men kicks the dead boy’s head to “[watch] the flies scatter” (28, 34). When some sections document Cross’s daydreaming about attempts he could have made to show Martha how much he loves her, others describe the ways in which the soldiers burned and pillaged the village of Than Khe with airstrikes and then “watched the wreckage,” and how they made jokes about Lavender’s drug use and his death, saying that whole incident was a real “mind blower” for him (40, 72). Also, after Lavender’s death, the reader further sees this contrast by how disturbed Cross is and how his role in the death “he would have to carry like a stone in his stomach for the rest of the war;” however, on the other hand, his men, such as Kiowa, “[wish] [they] could find some great sadness…, but the emotion [isn’t] there” and are just “pleased to be alive” after the incident is all done (42, 60). With contrast effectively established, these vast differences help to portray Cross as a man who still is holding onto his past and has not totally succumbed to the mentality and brutality of war, making him a rare subject on O’Brien’s battlefield.

Yet, sooner or later, the contrast stops and the transformation takes place, finally revealing the theme of war’s multifaceted destruction on the individual. Based around the death of Lavender, the transformation of Lieutenant Cross occurs once he realizes that if he had not been daydreaming about Martha when the sniper killed Lavender, he could have been able to save him. Confronted with this immense amount of guilt and the sense of failing his duties, he is utterly overwhelmed and suddenly any idealism that the lieutenant had vanishes as he finally realizes “she did not love him and never would” (43). With a vengeance against himself, he becomes a changed man, ordering his men to torch the village of Than Khe, burning the pictures and letters of Martha, and vowing to “perform his duties firmly and without negligence” (99). Therefore, in a way, he becomes a machine, giving his complete focus to his responsibilities and pushing out of his mind any hopes or memories from back home. Now, much like his men, he is devoid of emotion and only concerned about humping it and getting their mission accomplished as to “avoid the blush of dishonor” (77). Ultimately, in the end, the transformation shows how war has ruined any optimism within the heart of a certain individual and thus finally O’Brien’s theme is conveyed to the reader.

In the end, “The Things They Carried” is a short, but chilling testament to the effects of war on the human soul and goes to show that, regardless of the mission, war is inevitably a destructive force.

Psycho Killer: Analyzing the Rationality of Miss Dent's Actions in John Cheever's "The Five-Forty-Eight"

2008-09-28T17:23:00.000-07:00

In "The Five-Forty-Eight," the mentally-ill Miss Dent is a character of great dynamic and interest as she stalks and holds hostage her sexual abuser and former boss, Blake, and, through her actions, presents a question for the reader to take away with him or herself: were her actions in the story rational? or just a crazed fit produced by the synergy of her situation and her mental condition? While a bit inquisitive at first glance, a closer examination into the story answers this question, ultimately, revealing to us that, at the very core of her motives, her act of holding Blake hostage was quite irrational and purely a crazed fit caused by her unfortunate life situation.

To explain why this answer seems to be the correct one, one must first look deeper into retribution and the natural tendencies most people have when seeking it. For the majority of us, getting wronged or hurt in almost any way gives us a variety of negative emotions. Whether justified or cruel, that pain has an innate tendency to make us feel downtrodden or demoralized, as if we have failed and thus admitted our subordinance to whoever or whatever caused our suffering. But, as a result, our competitive nature, in turn, is ignited within us and thus begs us to seek out a manner in which we can punish our attackers and thereby regain a feeling of equality with them. For this reason, one can understand the motives behind Miss Dent's act and see how the will to seek revenge is simply human nature and therefore quite justified.

However, the irrationality--and thus insanity--of her crime comes into light upon investigating the execution of her plan to seek that retribution. Most of the time, the need to avenge our pains gives us a choice between two forms of punishments: violent punishment or emotional punishment. Those who choose violence often use anything from their fist to a gun to punish their enemy and, often times, are seeking to avenge a physical pain inflicted upon them. On the other hand, those who choose emotional punishment are usually much more moral in their actions and seek not to hurt their attackers physically, but to cause them to feel apologetic or bad.

With this in mind, the irrationality here becomes utterly limpid. First of all, the pain inflicted upon Miss Dent by Blake, while very evil and demeaning, is not physical at all. Emotional? yes. Sexual and physical? no, especially when one takes into account that Miss Dent slept with Blake voluntarily and with consent, thinking he was not unlike an amazing, divine being. On that note, her pain mostly comes from the act of using her for sex and then firing her from work, causing intense emotional distress and feelings of powerlessness and insecurity within herself (evidenced by her complete disappearance for about two weeks), especially in someone who is mentally ill. Therefore, in her instinctive search for retribution, she seeks the equivalent and would like Blake to feel the same fear, loss of power, and lack of self-confidence that she did.

Typically, given her pain, it would be expected that she would pursue the non-violent form of punishment, possibly filing a lawsuit against Blake or perhaps going to his superior and reporting the incident. That would be the most rational and justified approach. Instead, however, because of her mental condition that predisposes her to an irrational mindset that she cannot control, she chooses a more violent approach that is utterly unnecessary in the situation. Rather than find someone with more power than Blake, she is subjected by her mental state solely to her opinion of him as almost omnipotent. Thus, she is forced to seek out the method of becoming someone more powerful than Blake. This, combined with the fact that she really has no consequences (and is only subject to a return to the mental hospital if found guilty), thereby forces Miss Dent to make an irrational decision to pursue Blake and hold him at gunpoint to get her revenge.

In conclusion, regardless of the irrationality of the act, her attempt was successful and Miss Dent clearly accomplishes what she wants to do: re-establish that power and self-confidence within herself. Regardless of whether Blake learns his lesson or not, the fact that she controls his life for a relatively brief moment, causing him to sweat with fear, to attempt to reach out to his neighbors through eye language, and lie face-down in the dirt, is enough for her to regain her sense of self. Thus, in the end, she can simply walk off into the night, without ever having harmed Blake physically, and still remain as the somewhat heroine of the story. (788)

Blind Humor: Analyzing the Source of Humor in Raymond Carver's "Cathedral"

2008-09-21T20:22:00.000-07:00

Upon finishing Raymond Carver's intriguing and mesmerizing short story "Cathedral," one seems to find a variety of thoughts and emotions casually strolling through his or her mind as he or she becomes immersed in the relaxed reflection the story invokes. Using surprise, curiosity, intrigue, and confusion, "Cathedral" keeps the reader thinking and inquiring long after he or she finishes it. Yet, among the feelings listed above, there also lingers a certain humor that seems, in many ways, out of place. The subject matter and the characters seem to be more boring and bland than funny. So, therefore, by the end of our reflection, we are begging to know how a story about a man overcoming his prejudices against blind people can be so funny. On further examination, however, the answer does not seem so concealed and it appears that it is Carver's unique writing style and interesting plot that hold the key to that much-anticipated question.

First, Carver's writing style invokes this sense of humor through the relationship he develops between his speaker and the reader. Much like how one would have a funny, casual conversation with a close friend, Carver's writing attempts to make friends between the main character and reader by keeping the speaker's narration rather informal and relaxed. Using interjections, colloquial diction, and side comments, the author crafts both an informality and a close bond between the reader and the speaker while also injecting the element of humor into the story. One example of this is when our narrator finishes his descriptions of his wife's former marriage with "etc." Although quite subtle and obviously leaving us out on many details, the injection of this word enhances the casual tone of the narration and, by its illustration of the speaker's utter indifference to his wife's previous relationships, makes the reader laugh. Consequently, one gets a sense of the narrator not only as someone he or she is talking to, but also as someone who comes off as dry-witted and funny. In turn, this results in a deeper character understanding that allows the reader to appreciate the speaker's mannerisms more and as the story continues he becomes funnier and funnier. Thus, writing like this permeates "Cathedral" and, with the deeper understanding of the main character, makes the story's plot seem even funnier.

On the other hand, the other element causing the humor here is simply the plot itself. At first glance, the story's plot would not come off as very funny. Characterized by no change of setting and absolutely no action, "Cathedral"'s lesson of a lazy, judging, and un-happily married man learning to see a blind man as more than his lack of sight through drawing appears to the unsuspecting reader to be dry at best. After reading it, however, it becomes apparent that this dry subject matter is, in fact, why the story is so funny. In an ironic way, the story's bland subject matter juxtaposed with the interest and intrigue the reader has afterwards very much creates a situation that many can find humorous, as if to say, "did I just read a story about two guys, one blind, smoking dope and drawing pictures?" Yes, you did. Furthermore, the fact that the two men are casually smoking marijuana, drinking, and staying up late adds to the humor because, in American culture, those actions are often associated with laziness and lack of motion, but, since the story has no physical action, Carver is forced to make smoking and drinking the very action that drives the plot forward. This, combined with the speaker's dry wit and Carver's unique and talented writing style, causes the story to end up being quite funny while still provoking thought and effectively getting the main theme of the story through.

In conclusion, "Cathedral" is a remarkably funny short story and the humor, theme, and the way to the two are intertwined within truly show the incredible talent that Raymond Carver had as a writer. The story amazingly demonstrates originality and creativity, and is, all in all, a favorite read so far this year.

The Middle-Age Wasteland: Parental Responsibility in "Teenage Wasteland"

2008-09-14T14:23:00.000-07:00

In Anne Tyler's "Teenage Wasteland," the reader gets an extremely in-depth view into the difficulty and significance of parenting through Daisy's desperate attempt to save her son from his seemingly out-of-control, downward spiral. Consumed and overwhelmed with the dream of making Donnie a well-behaved, intelligent kid, Daisy's actions in the story become, in many ways, desperate and hurt Donnie in the end rather than help him, eventually leading to his mysterious disappearance at the end of the story. Thus, by means of this counterexample, Tyler creates a theme illustrating the importance of keeping one's head clear and focused when parenting, showing us that using common sense and logic is often better and more effective than solely using idealism and hope.

Central to developing this theme is the character of Cal, who enters the story about halfway through as an individual who is intended give Donnie "some academic help and a better sense of self-worth;" however, as the plot unfolds, Cal appears to provide Donnie with more of an escape from school and family life than with a means to confront it head on (37). Holding meetings at his house with his other students, rather than one-on-one in a classroom or office, Cal provides Donnie and the other teenagers there with a sociable, laid-back atmosphere, complete with ping-pong, rock music, and a basketball net. Furthermore, he takes them to rock concerts, lets them hang out at his house, and gets involved in their love lives. On top of that, the tutor's attitude and speech, often making comments such as "[we'll] see if we can show that school of yours a thing or two," gives off a sense of immaturity and rebelness that appeals more to teenagers than to the parents that are getting "flutters of panic" through their chests every time they receive a bill from Cal (37, 36). Independent from the context of the plot, these factors alone seem to portray an environment not suited to develop learning skills, but rather to create an escape from that development by providing a party house and a cool adult to make the escape possible.

Therefore, to the rational, clear-minded parent, the initial observations listed above and those that Daisy observes when she first walks in Cal's door should be a clear indication that sending one's child here would not be a good idea; yet, Daisy, in her disparity to salvage what she can of a kid who "had talent, was smart, and was good with his hands" at one time or another, ignores all these warning signs and lets Cal tutor Donnie, thus, becoming blinded by the seemingly quixotic desire to correct Donnie's faults (37). In essence, her optimism overcomes her rationality and common sense and gives Daisy a mindset ignorant of Cal's fallibility or the possible danger he may present to children (i.e. child molestation, assault, etc.). As a result, she foolishly lets Cal, and indirectly, Donnie, overrun her life and control her decisions. For example, when Cal calls Daisy and discusses with her how Donnie does not like the lack of trust given to him by his parents, Daisy agrees with Cal and goes along with his accusations that they "expect the worst from him" and that they "don't understand how [not being trusted] hurts," admitting that he's right rather than supporting her reasons for finding him untrustworthy (such as his drinking and smoking habits) (38). Furthermore, this trend continues even after one of Donnie's teachers call to say that his grades are slipping to F's and after Daisy learns that some of Cal's other students have been knifed, sent to boarding school, or taken out of the program; she simply remains quiet about any qualms she may have or submits herself to the reassuring responses of Calvin. By the end of the story, when Donnie gets expelled from school from having cigarettes and beer in his locker, it appears as if it is too late to help Donnie and Daisy's now-belated, but newly discovered opposition to Cal in his defense of Donnie regarding the expulsion is almost useless. Even though they put Donnie in public school and stop the tutoring sessions, the child "gather[s] no friends, join[s] no clubs," and is "defeated and exhausted" (42). Soon after, he disappears, never to be heard of again, and the story reveals the enormous and devastating impact Daisy's quixotic, blinding hopes had on Donnie. In the end, her good intentions and change of thought are too late and she ultimately becomes a failure by the normal standards of parenting.

In conclusion, from "Teenage Wasteland," we thus learn that truly it is the parent who should have the most influence on a child and that submitting that responsibility to another can often have disastrous consequences. Thus, in the true style of Anne Tyler, this story provides valuable insight into family values and provides us with lessons for us all to learn.

Summer Reading Blog

2008-08-25T21:24:00.000-07:00

Summer Reading:

Tuesday's with Morrie by Mitch Albom

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time by Mark Haddon

Required: Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen

Simply put, this list may not be the most impressive AP English summer reading resume that one has ever seen, but to be completely honest, that is simply due to the fact that reading has never been my number-one leisure activity. I do enjoy learning new things, discovering new perspectives on life's challenges, and investigating random inquiries that pop into my head, and I am completely committed to any reading assigned in school no matter what subject. Yet, it is the act of spending hours wedged into a sofa and being immersed into a jungle of paper and ink that really does not appeal to me and my active, outdoorsy interests. Yet, every once in a while, I come across a book that just happens to spark my leisurely interests enough to keep me wedged in that couch enough times over a month or so to make the journey to the end. This summer, that book just happened to be Tuesday's with Morrie by Mitch Albom.

A true story documenting the last few months the book's author spent with his long-time friend and old sociology professor, Morrie Schwartz, who was terminally ill with Lou Gehrig's Disease when work on the book began, Tuesday's with Morrie is the narration of a series of Tuesdays before Schwartz's death in which Albom tape-recorded his dying professor's observations on life and his thoughts what it means to live, love, die, and find happiness. Beginning with the reconnection and reunion of the two thirty or so years since Albom graduated Bowdoin and after his learning of Schwartz's disease through the popular television show Nightline, the book follows their journey of life lessons and, in turn, forces the reader to make an introspective look at his or her own reasons for living and perspectives on life.

By discussing such deep and meaningful subjects as relationships, friendships, death, birth (children), and material wealth verses spiritual wealth, I was deeply fascinated with the thoughts presented and quite overwhelmed with the immense amount of "food for thought" in the novel. Throughout the text, Schwartz's lesson's showed me that no matter how deep the subject matter, even the most complex and difficult problems in life are so simple to solve and usually come down to a black-and-white decision that is often easy to make. For example, in one instance, Morrie talks of road rage as a way to explain the impact and significance of everyday kindness. He notes how, back when he could drive, whenever someone would cut him off in traffic, he would often times raise up his fist as if to give the finger, then, at the last moment, turn his fist around, wave, and begin to smile. The vast majority of the time, he found a spontaneous smile or laugh as the response to his action, thereby showing us that kindness is so easily contagious and is one simple way to make yourself and others happy. Thus, the simple decision to not display an act of anger and aggression had a much more positive outcome than the converse. These kinds of simple lessons are packed throughout the novel, thus giving the reader a notion of simplicity in life, even when his or her problems may seem disastrous and unsolvable.

All in all, I found this book very refreshing and a great way to provoke my mind with philosophic ideas, while keeping me engaged with the modern, true-to-life story. In a heartbeat, I would recommend this book to anyone looking for a quick, easy, yet insightful read...or anyone just stuck wedged in a couch.